53. Therefore, the extension of the time limit granted by the Court, rendered the original application timely and the application to remedy the failure to issue a statement, admissible. IX- MERIT The application on the Court's judgment on the issue of compensation 54. The Applicant submits that in the Judgment rendered in Case No. ECW/CCJ/APP/27/17 and dated 28 June 2019, this Court, at page 29, while finding that the conduct of the Respondent’s official who prevented the Applicant from entering the Republic of Senegal constituted a violation of the Applicant’s right to free movement of persons, goods and services as guaranteed by Articles 13 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, no compensation was awarded in favor of the Applicant in accordance with the principle enunciated in Ashby v. White (1703) 14 St Tr 695, 92 ER 126. 55. He further submits that no pronouncement has been made about the type of compensation relating to damages for violation of the Applicant’s right. 56. He therefore prays the Court to supplement the Judgment in Case No. ECW/CCJ/APP/27/17 between SUNDAY CHARLES UGWUABA v. REPUBLIC OF SENEGAL delivered on Wednesday, June 28, 2019, mandating the Respondent to pay the Applicant general compensation for violation of the fundamental right to freedom of movement of persons, goods and services. 57. The Respondent, on its turn, in its response, pleads that in the judgment delivered on 28 June 2019, the Court held that: “The Respondent, the State of Senegal, violated the human right of the Applicant, SUNDAY CHARLES UGWUABA, to the free movement of persons, goods and 13