against the African Union, which makes it compliant with the requirement of Rule 50(2)(c) of the Rules. 35. The Court further considers that the Application meets the requirements of Rule 50(2)(d) of the Rules, since it is not based on news disseminated exclusively through the mass media, but rather on judicial decisions and legislative and regulatory provisions of the Respondent State. 36. With regard to the requirement of Rule 50(2)(e) of the Rules on the exhaustion of local remedies, the Court notes that, as it emerges from the record, the Applicants seized the Administrative Section of the Supreme Court to “regularize their administrative situation by registering them on the list of trainee inspectors or trainee police superintendents due to undergo training”. This referral and the subsequent proceedings were the subject of various Supreme Court decisions. 37. The Court observes that the grievances raised in the present Application relate to issues of law that have been the subject of the proceedings initiated by the Applicants before the Respondent State’s Supreme Court, which ruled thereon. The Court underscores that under Articles 1105 and 1116 of the Organic Law of 23 September 2016 on the organization and functioning of the Supreme Court, decisions handed down by the said court are not subject to appeal. Consequently, the Court considers that local remedies were exhausted. 38. The Court therefore holds that the Application meets the requirement of Rule 50(2)(e) of the Rules. 5 Article 110: The administrative division is the supreme judge of all decisions handed down by lower administrative jurisdictions, as well as of decisions handed down in the final instance by administrative bodies with jurisdictional status. 6 Article 111: The administrative section is competent to hear, in the first and last instance, appeals on grounds of ultra vires against decrees, ministerial or inter-ministerial orders and acts of national or independent administrative authorities. 9