apostasy and adultery.f It is stated that both the first and second Victims were indicted, but later on, only the first Victim was found guilty of adultery. To what extent does the Commission find a differential treatment of the parties in a similar situation? The Commission reiterates its stance in Kenneth Good vs the Republic of Botswana (also cited in analysis of violation of article 2 above) that article 3 of the African Charter is violated not only where equal cases are treated differently but where a difference in treatment does not have an objective and reasonable justification and if there is no proportionality between the aim sought and the means employed. 152. Regarding these requirements, the Commiss Victim's adultery conviction, particularly similarly found guilty. Consequently, she was " I }o, ' 153. The Commission agrees that the Respondent'State has equal protection under Article 3 of the African Charter to equality and Victim. Oil alleged Violations of Article 4: thi/Right to Life and Integrity oftHe)lftrson 154. Article 4 of the Charter states, right to respect his life' -' the arbitrarily deprived of this' ",' II TJ~e ;erson is i~violable. Ev;;fj~lluman being has the moral int~grity of his person. No one shall be 155. To characterize tl;le rights to its decision in Forum of Conscience vs Sierra Leone" that the right to i,s, the basis of aU:gther rights. And that it is the source from which other rights flow, and anYJ:~mjustified violation of this right amounts to an arbitrary deprivation. The Commissi&J1~i~lso considers the position adopted by the Afri Court on Human and Peoples' R1g11t? in the African Commission on Human and Pea, • h,ts vs Kenya,87(the Ogiek case), rettirning to the fundamental character of the right' :"" . ating th~!;~ll?ther ~l~.~tsand freedoms depend on this right. The Court consid , "Ying sOm~OnJi:: dfJife eliminates the very holder of those rights and freedom ' , 156. The Commis~i9-t1' also r~ii~rates the United Nations Human Rights Committee's considerationtjiat lithe right to life encompasses the right of persons to be free from acts and omissions iht~f}ded to cause or expected to cause their unnatural or premature death, and to live with digp,ity."89 The Commission agrees with the Committee's position that deprivation of life involves deliberate or at least foreseeable and preventable harm "_,,J. See para 62 and 63 complainants' Submission on merits ,~ t: ',' Communication 223/98- Forum of Conscience vi Sierra Leone (2000) ACHPR para 20. .' st.C' 'I, <. 87 Application 006/2012- (2017) AfCHPR . , l' '0...,-88 Ibid, para 152 s(89 General Comment No. 36 of the UN Human Rights Committee on Article 6 of the InternatiCJla),cIoveriru;~onJiiVil ~ and Political Rights", para 3 .'! f. ~\." ,,,/ ~i ~ , ,,,. AU.U \I: A ,5...,v., 85 86 0 .> /' /' ~ ,., u,j. '--- c- ::j, J <.J/. '\ (' ·.\34 .jI \':'0, "1, h:ICAIN\ .. t)'-~ (Co "" . '~"ft "':r- E'T [I>" f .>--.::_: . •"I\. ,\ h ~ ......-;; ... -'If ~