independent panel with expertise in the field of compensation and reparation for human rights violations already proposed is sufficient. 226. The Complainants requested the Commission to make such fur the or other recommendations as it deems appropriate in the circumstances of the case. In this regard, based on the jurisprudence developed by the inter-American Court, the Commission requests the DRC to publish this judgment. Indeed, in the case of Xakmok Krisek Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, the Court found that even if the Complainants had not requested this remedy, it would be an important measure of satisfaction for the time that this community has waited in requesting the protection of its rights.116 lt requested the Republic of Paraguay to publish certain parts of its judgment in the official gazette, the publication of a summary of the judgment prepared by the court in a daily newspaper of national scope, the publication of the judgment in its entirety on an official government website for a period of at least one year1!7 . Finally, it requested that the summary of the judgment be read on a radio station covering the region of the Xdkmok Kasck community. 7he Inter-American Court has decided this remedy in a number of other judgmentslll' . Thus, in the present case, the Commission requests the Democratic Republic of Congo to publish a summary of the judgment within a period not exceeding6 months after notification of the judgment: The official summary of the judgment prepared by the Commission in an official journal. • The summary of the judgment prepared by the Commission in a reputable newspaper with national coverage. • This decision in its entirety on an official website which will be available for one year. The Commission also finds that it would be appropriate for the State to publish the summary of this decision in lirench; that of BAIWA and other surrounding communities on a radio station that covers the Kahuzi-Biega Fark area. is InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, Case of The Xdkmok Kések Indigenous Community V. Paraguay, Judgement of August 24, 2012, para 298. 117 /bid H8 lnteramerican court of Human Rights, case of Huilca Tecse v. Peru, Judgment of March 3, 2005, para 111. See also InterAmerican Court of Human Rights, case of the Kalina and Lokono Peoples v. Surname, Judgment of 25, 2015, paras 312 & 313. See also lnteramerican Court of Liurt]ap,.,f}ights, case of The Kichwa Indigenous People of sarayaku v. Ecuador, judgment of June 27,2012, WU M ' 1 A Q PS' 56 .L ¢~