31 136. Should the beneficiary be unable to receive such payment within the prescribed time periods due to causes within his control, the State shall either deposit said amounts in an account opened in the beneficiary’s name or draw a certificate of deposit from an Argentine financial institution, in United States dollars, under the most favorable financial terms available pursuant to the laws and banking practices in force. Should such compensation remain unclaimed after a period of ten years, the amounts thus deposited shall revert to the State, along with the interest accrued thereon. 137. The amounts awarded in this Judgment as compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses shall be delivered to the beneficiary in full, pursuant to the provisions hereof, free of any tax deductions. 138. Should the State fall into arrears, it shall pay interest on the outstanding amount at the banking default interest rate applicable in Argentina. 139. In line with its constant practice, the Court reserves its right, inherent in its jurisdiction and arising from the provisions of Article 65 of the American Convention, to monitor full compliance with this Judgment. The case will be closed once the State has fully complied with the provisions of this Judgment. Within a period of one year as from the date of service of this Judgment, the State shall submit to the Court a report on the measures adopted to comply herewith. IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 140. Now therefore, THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, DECLARES: Unanimously that, 1. It admits the acknowledgment of international responsibility made by the State, under the terms of paragraphs 18 to 28 of this Judgment, and that a violation of the right to freedom of thought and expression as enshrined by Articles 13(1) and 13(2) of the InterAmerican Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the general obligations set forth in Articles 1(1) and 2 thereof has been committed to the detriment of Eduardo Kimel, under the terms of paragraphs 51 to 95 of this Judgment. 2. It admits the acknowledgement of international responsibility made by the State, under the terms of paragraphs 18 to 28 of this Judgment, and that a violation of the right to a fair trial within a reasonable time, as enshrined by Article 8(1) of the Inter-American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to the general obligation set forth in Article 1(1) thereof, has been committed to the detriment of Eduardo Kimel, under the terms of paragraphs 96 and 97 of this Judgment.