 Article 20 which requires journalists to disclose confidential sources of information;  Articles 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 44 and 45 which provide an unduly onerous and restrictive framework for the regulation of the print and web media;  Article 46 which provides for a prior censorship regime for films proposed to be directed in Burundi;  Articles 48,49,50,51,52,53 and 54 which provide for a right of reply and correction that is vaguely worded and unduly impedes the media’s right to freedom of expression;  Articles 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67,68 and 69 which provide for a regime of fines and penalties that is allegedly unduly restrictive on the right to freedom of expression and fails to comply with generally accepted principles of criminal law and procedure. 11. For the above reasons and other reasons to be set out later, the Applicant beseeches this Court to:i) Declare that the Burundi Press Law violates the right to press freedom and thereby constitutes a violation of Burundi’s obligation under the Treaty to uphold and protect the Community principles of democracy, rule of law, accountability, transparency and good governance as specified in Articles 6(d) and 7(2) of the Treaty; ii) Declare that the Burundi Press Law violates the press’ right to freedom of expression and thereby constitutes a violation of Burundi’s obligation under the Treaty to uphold and protect human and peoples’ rights standards as specified in Articles 6(d), 7(2)of the Treaty; iii) Order Government of Burundi to, without delay: a) Repeal the Press Law; or Reference No. 5 of 2013 Page 4