swiftly referred the matter to the National Boundary Commission for necessary action. That in compliance with the judgment of the supreme Court, its National Boundary Commission called all the stake holders meeting involving all the officials of the two State government representing the Members of the Communities before constituting a technical Committee to commence the tracing of the boundary adjustment. That during the pendency of this matter, it wrote a letter to the National Boundary Commission in charge of issues relating to boundary dispute within the various States of the Federation and in response, the National Boundary Commission disclose its efforts of resolving the dispute between Enugu and Kogi States. That matters of this nature are to be resolved by the National Boundary Commission. That during the crisis, security agencies were deployed for the purpose of quelling the unrest in the interest of peace, security and the peaceful coexistence of the various groups/individuals in both Kogi and Enugu States respectively. The Defendant further averred that the responsibility of ensuring peaceful co-existence between the various ethnic groups in Kogi and Enugu States is a collective responsibility of both the government and the governed and 12