the criteria established for the investigation of such cases, 324 which includes due diligence in investigating different hypotheses for the reasons that prompted violations of the personal integrity of Messrs. Cabrera and Montiel. In this regard, the Court notes that the Istanbul Protocol has been incorporated into the domestic legislation (supra para. 119) and it is important that those standards are upheld in order to strengthen the due diligence, appropriateness and effectiveness of the respective investigation. Similarly, the pertinent disciplinary and administrative or criminal actions must be undertaken in the event that the investigation of the facts reveals procedural and investigative irregularities. C. Measures of satisfaction, rehabilitation and guarantees of nonrepetition C.1 Measures of satisfaction i) Publication of the Judgment 216. The Commission requested that the Court order the State to publish this Judgment in a newspaper with national circulation. The representatives specified that it should be published “both in the Official Gazette of the Federation as well as in two newspapers with the largest circulation in the country chosen in agreement with the victims.” The representatives also requested that excerpts of the Judgment be published in the “Official Gazette of the [s]tate of Guerrero and in publications of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Federal Judiciary, the Public Federal Defense Office, the Secretariat for National Defense (SEDENA) and the Secretariat for the Environment and Natural Resources (SEMARNAT).” Furthermore, “[i]n view of the fact that radio is most widely used medium in the state of Guerrero, the Judgment should also be broadcast [using] such media,” particularly the that “cover the municipalities of Petatlán and Coyuca de Catalán.” 217. As it has ordered in other cases, 325 the Court deems appropriate to order the State, as a measure of satisfaction, to publish this Judgment, once, in the Federation’s Official Gazette and in Semanario Judicial de la Federación [Judiciary Weekly Magazine] and its Gazette, with the corresponding headings and subheadings, but without the footnotes, as well as the operative paragraphs. Likewise, the State must: i) publish the official summary of the Judgment issued by the Court in a newspaper with wide national circulation and in a newspaper with a large circulation in the state of Guerrero; ii) fully publish this Judgment 326 on the official web site of the Federal State and of the state of Guerrero, taking into account the nature of the publication ordered, which shall remain available for at least one year and iii) broadcast the official summary, at least once, on a radio station 327 which covers the municipalities of Petatlán and Coyuca de Catalán. These 324 Cf. Case of Radilla Pacheco v. Mexico, supra note 302, para. 331; Case of Fernández Ortega et al. v. Mexico, supra note 39, para. 228; and Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico, supra note 30, para. 211. 325 Cf. Case of Barrios Altos v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of November 30, 2001. Series C N° 87, Operative Paragraph 5.d); Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico, supra note 30, para. 229; and Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña, supra note 30, para. 244. 326 Cf. Case of the Serrano Cruz Sisters v. El Salvador. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of March 1, 2005. Series C No. 120, para. 195; Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico, supra note 30, para. 229; and Case of Ibsen Cárdenas and Ibsen Peña v. Bolivia, supra note 30, para. 244. 327 Cf. Case of the Yakye Axa Indigenous Community v. Paraguay. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of June 17, 2005. Series C No. 125, para. 227; Case of Fernández Ortega et al. v. Mexico, supra note 39, para. 247; and Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico, supra note 30, para. 229. 81