132. The foregoing notwithstanding, the Court finds, for reasons now well established in its practice, and in the particular circumstances of the instant case, that publication of this judgment is necessary. Such a measure is meant to ensure non-repetition of the violation found25 in the sense that it reminds domestic courts to comply with the provisions of Article 7(1) of the charter and Article 14 of the ICCPR, which stipulate that all judicial decisions must be delivered in open court. 133. Consequently, the Court orders the Respondent State, within three months from the date of notification, to publish this judgment on the websites of the Judiciary and the Ministry of Justice, and to ensure that the text of the Judgment remains accessible for at least one year after the date of publication. ii. Implementation and reporting 134. The Parties do not make specific prayers in respect of implementation and reporting. *** 135. However, the justification provided earlier in respect of the Court’s decision to order publication of the judgment equally applies to implementation and reporting. The Court also notes that the order relating to reporting on the measures taken by a Respondent State is a matter of judicial practice.26 136. The Court therefore finds it appropriate to order the Respondent State to submit to it, within six months of notification of this Judgment, periodic reports on the implementation thereof, indicating the measures taken to comply with this Judgment, in accordance with Article 30 of the Protocol. 25 Legal and Human Rights Centre and Another v. United Republic of Tanzania, AfCHPR, Application No. 039/2020, Judgment of 13 June 2023 (merits and reparations), § 180. 26 LHRC and Another v. Tanzania, supra, § 183; Habyalimana Augustino and Muburu Abdulkarim v. United Republic of Tanzania, AfCHPR, Application No. 015/2016, judgment of 3 September 2024, § 253. 30