Christopher Mtkila v. United Republic of Tanzania , the Court itself decided proprio motu to order the publication of one of its decisions as a measure of satisfaction.36 99. The Court further notes that measures regarding the publication of its decision, if couched in reasonable terms, will not in any way amount to humiliation for the Respondent State. 100. Relying on its own jurisprudence afore-mentioned (supra, para. 98), the Court is of the opinion that as a measure of satisfaction, the Respondent State should, within six months from the date of this Judgment, publish: (i) the official summary of this Judgment drafted by the Registry of the Court in French, once in the official gazette, and once in a widely read national Daily; (ii) the same summary on an official internet website of the Respondent State, and maintain the publication for one year. B) "Guarantees of non-repetition" 101 . In their Brief on Reparations regarding what they characterize as "guarantees of nonrepetition", the Applicants prayed the Court to order "the re-opening of investigations so that the perpetrators of the assassination may be apprehended and brought before national courts", and "to order Burkinabe authorities to submit [to the Court] , all information concerning the initiatives taken to that effect within six (6) months". 102. In its Brief in Response, still basing its argument on humiliation, the Respondent State indicates that "exacting the immediate resumption of investigations and production within a time limit of six months, of all information on measures taken to that effect, is contemptuous to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Burkina Faso", specifically Articles 188 and 18937 thereof. It further argues that "it continues to make i 6 Judgment of 13 June 2014, paragraphs 45 and 46 (5) These provisions read as follows: Article 188: "the indicted person whose case the investigating magistrate has ruled should not continue can no longer be pursued on the basis of the same facts unless new evidence is discovered; Article 189: considered as new charges are: witness statements, documents and reports, which having not been submitted for consideration by the investigating Magistrate are however likely to back up the charges which would have been considered too weak, i.e. to provide facts regarding new developments useful in determming the truth" (Registry translation). 37 31