tf"•,) ACHPR L /4 , African Cornrn1ss1on on Human and Peoples' flights Human Rights our Collective Responsibi lity lapsed, requesting the Commission to suspend the Complaint until the former had successfully exhausted local remedies. 24. The Complainants highlighted that they did not intend to withdraw the Complaint, instead requesting that the Commission suspend the matter, a procedure that is not catered for in the ROP 2020. 25. Since then, the Complainants have not made any strides or shown any interest in prosecuting their Complaint before the Commission, nor have they given any feedback or updates on their efforts in doing so. 26. The Commission notes that more than two years and seven months have lapsed since the extension of time the Complainants had requested and committed to submitting their Arguments and Evidence on Admissibility and Merits of this Communication, which they did not do. 27 . In view of the foregoing, the Commission concludes that the Complainants have not shown any interest in pursuing the present communication. 28. The Commission draws attention to its case law, in particular in communications 735/19 Residents of the Mau Forest Complex (represented by the Centre for Comparative and International Law and the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa) v The Republic of Kenya; 594/15 Mohammed Ramadan Mahmoud Fayad Allah v. Arab Republic of Egypt; 612/16 Ahmed Mohammed Ali Subaie v. Arab Republic of Egypt; 412/16 Ahmed Mohammed Ali Subaie v. Arab Republic of Egypt. Arab Republic of Egypt; 412/12 Journal Echos du Nord v. Republic of Gabon and communication 387/10 Kofi Yamagnane v. Togo, which were also struck out for lack of diligent prosecution. Decision of the African Commission 29. In view of the above , the Commission decides to strike out the present complaint for want of diligent prosecution. UMAN . •,. () ~ o"° Adopted at the 84th Ordinary Session of the African Commission, from 21 to 30 July 2025. <(1' "';c· ~ i1 ' u.l ~ 0 5 C: ,q.·R,cp.,~\'. · E ET oES .,