(:i~-~\ ACH PR /4 · African Cornrn1ss1on on , • , A Human Rights our Collective Responsibility Human and Peoples' Rights in the Republic of South Africa have not been unduly prolonged. They submit that any delays in the present case would have been a result of the Complainants failing to observe South African procedural Law. 11 42. The Commission observes that the Respondent State does not contest any of the other grounds for admissibility as enshrined in Article 56 of the Charter.12 THE COMMISSION'S ANALYSIS ON ADMISSIBILITY 43. A Communication submitted in terms of Article 55 must satisfy the seven requirements in Article 56 of the Charter in order to be declared admissible. 44. The Commission recalls that the conditions outlined in Article 56 of the Charter are cumulative and should all be adequately fulfilled for a communication submitted in conformity with the terms of Article 55 to be admissible. Consequently, non-fulfillment of any one of these conditions is liable to render a communication inadmissible. 13 The Commission now considers the submissions of the parties in light of these requirements seriatim. Article 56(1) of the Charter 45. Article 56(1) of the Charter states that "Communications relating to Human and Peoples' Rights ... received by the Commission shall be considered if they indicate their authors even if the latter request anonymity ... " The requirement here is that complainants or authors of complaints proffer their identity14 and contact details 15 to enable the Commission to adequately process the communication through assurances of continued interest in the matter. 16 In the present case, the Communication is brought by Jacobus Stephanus Van Heerden and Amour Technology Systems (Pty) Ltd (The Complainants). Liberty Fighters Network, represented by one Mr. Reyno De Beer are the Representatives. The Commission notes that there was a misunderstanding 11 Respondent State's Observations on Admissibility & Merits, para 34-35 12 Respondent State's Observations on Admissibi lity & Merits, para 36-39 13 Communication 304/2005 - FIDH & Others v Senegal {2006) ACHPR para 38 14 Communication 308/05 : Michael Majuru v Zimbabwe, 24 November 2008, para 71. 15 Communication 70/92_9: lbrahima Dioumessi, Sekou Kande, Ousmane Kaba v Guinea, 7 October 1~~~~ 11. 16 Communication 277/2003-Spilg and Mack & Ditshwanelo (on behalf of Lehlohonolo Be ~ J 0 Botswana, 12 October 2013, para 97. 71 Page vz The African Commission on Human a 31 BIj1lo Annex Layout, Ko West Coa Phone: (220) 230 4361 F F'm:::1il · :::11 t-h~nii II