evidence of prosecution witnesses during the trial within a trial conducted regarding admission of the exhibit; (e) the High Court erred by relying on the exhibit to find that he fu lly participated in the murder as the exhibit only proved theft; and (f) both the High Court and the Court of Appeal unfairly convicted him on the basis of prosecution evidence that was not credible . II. 4. Procedure before the Court The Application was received at the Registry of the Court on 22 March 2016. 5. Pursuant to Rule 36 of the Rules of Court, on 3 May 2016, the Registry served the Application on the Respondent. Ill. Jurisdiction 6. In dealing with an Application, the Court has to ascertain that it has jurisdiction on the merits of the case under Articles 3 and 5 of the Protocol.