to produce the documents and is in a position to do so since they are a product of national institutions. In this regard therefore, the Applicant is unable to respond fully to the Respondent's Response. On the substance iii, On the Democratic these substance, the Applicant Party and the subsequent years Respondent resulted exclusively to prevent any matter consolidated is also a the independent natural that the creation of the cost of running the party for all from election, in violation of the Charter. this states strategy adopted candidate from by the standing for Litigation before the African Court on consequence of this state of affairs by the decision of the Court of Appeal, and it can also be said that it is the result of the shortcoming of the Respondent State, as pointed out by the Court in its Judgment of 14 June 2013. iv. Regarding the claim for compensation occasioned to the Applicant, common sense arising moral harm he maintains that this stress is a matter of out of the management federal nature (involving Tanganyika where such a for stress and of any and Zanzibar). structure of a This is particularly structure is involved in carrying out political and electoral campaigns at different levels and in all the regions, as this can only lead to considerable stress, especially as it was full time work which prevented the Applicant from carrying out any other professional activity. In the instant case, only the Applicant's religious duties were compatible with the management of his political party. Ne nate : aye J RAG a , 6 ae Fo,