.~cHP: · ACH PR ' African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights The complainant's observations on admissibility cxmro Human Rights our Collective Responsibility 26. The Complainants allege that the Communication satisfies all the requirements of Admissibility set out in Article 56 of the African Charter and present arguments in support of this statement. 27. Regarding Article 56 ( 1) of the African Charter, the Complainants clearly indicated who the complainants were. 28. With regard to Article 56 (2) of the African Charter, the Complainants contend that the Complaint is in accordance with the Charter insofar as the Communication is against an AU Member and a State Party to the ACHPR. In addition, the imminent eviction operation by the Respondent State violates the rights contained in the African Charter. 29. With regard to Article 56(3) of the African Charter, the Complainants allege that the Communication does not contain any outrageous or insulting terms. 30. In relation to Article 56(4) of the African Charter, the Complainants allege that the Complaint is not based solely on information from the media. 31. With regard to Article 56(5) of the African Charter, complainants argue that the principle of exhaustion of domestic remedies is based on the logic that the State party should have priority in dealing with a case by granting it the opportunity to rule on a matter before it is transferred to international courts. 32. The complainants further argue that in this way an international court is not considered a court of first instance. The Commission, however, "has never considered that the requirement of local remedies applies literally in cases where it is not practical or desirable for the complainant to go to national courts in the event of any breach." 33. The complainants further allege that the Commission has always considered that remedies at national level must be "available, effective and sufficient", so that "if the right is not well guaranteed, there can be no effective remedy or remedy". In this regard , remedies are considered to be "available if the applicant has access to them without hindrance", "effective if it offers a prospect of success" and "sufficient if it is able to remedy the damage". 34. The complainants allege that several cases related to the issue have b to Kenyan courts by individuals, groups, etc. The previous case file des Maasai community was in the form of an appeal to the High Cou