p.CHPq (~ fJ6~t!,Ef{ Human Righb ou, Human and Peoples· Rights Collective Responsibility Lohe Issa Konate v. Burkina Faso10 (application 004/2013, Judgment, 5 December 2014). paragraphs 64-73). 65. Thus, in view of the foregoing , the Commission can unequivocally state that it has not identified any derogatory or insulting language in this complaint. It simply describes objective facts and makes justifiable allegations, substantiated by the presentation of more evidence. News disseminated through the media (Article 56 (4)) 66.Article 56 (4) requires that Communications "are not based exclusively on news disseminated through the media". 67. The Commission notes that the facts presented are substantiated and corroborated by sworn statements by witnesses and reports from international organizations, including the United Nations . (Human Rights Council). For these reasons, the Commission considers that the conditions of Article 56(4) have been met. Depletion of local resources (Article 56(5)) 68.Article 56(5) of the African Charter requires that Communications "be submitted after the exhaustion of local remedies, if any, unless it is obvious that this procedure is unduly prolonged". 69. The principle enshrined in the African Charter underlines the importance of the judicial sovereignty of the Respondent State, as it gives priority and opportunity to the Respondent State to deal with the matter and correct any alleged violation through national courts. The international dispute settlement process is then the last resort for any individual, when all administrative and judicial remedies at home have been exhausted. That is, in the context in which the national judicial system is the main means to request and obtain redress for human rights violations. It is also important to give the State the opportunity to be informed of alleged rights violations and to take appropriate corrective action on the basis of the determination of the applicable domestic judicial procedures. This same principle has been established by the Commission in the case of the World Organization Against Torture, the Lawyers' 10 Communication Loh~ Issa Konat~ v. Burkina Paso .h1.!J.11&s:/L1.l.!:!!\V\\ ~"<~r,,1<(.d trimc,H!):!V3!Jl!.!!•rl,.Q!.or:gwrn!LJi!!!lm,~a •~·•~Cil !.1!->E.'S~.!.h11!.\!Jd1.)J 11/.rirf. llli!BJ/fE.~ 2011'•201-<>ht' '1.201,;s,1%21/Konah' 'l.20v'\. 2Qllu Ik in,1 't ~0F,,>O '\ 20--Fni:llilh£!!! - ~