politicized and neutral Judges lose their jobs. They allege that the Judges issued an unreasonably harsh sentence on the Victim. 9. The Complainants submit that this Complaint has never been presented before any other international dispute settlement forum for settlement or adjudication and that it has been filed before the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (the Commission) within a reasonable time in accordance with Article 56(6) of the Charter. Articles alleged to have been violated 10. The Complainant alleges that the Respondent ' 5, 6, 7(a), (b), 8, 19, 60 and 61 of # an Rights. < iolated Articles 1, 2,3, 4, Tuman and Peoples’ Procedure 15. By note weit ie dated 30 October 2017 and received at the Secretariat on 24 November 2017, the Respondent State indicated that the Complainant had not made their submissions on admissibility within the required time frame and requested that the Communication be struck out. Analysis of the Commission to strike out 16. Rule 105(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Procedure establishes that when the Commission has decided to be seized of a Communication, it shall request the Complainant to present arguments on Admissibility within two (2) months. AS Ps pe AND py wAT foes ik Via