thirty (30) Joint Communications 481-484/14, 486-488/14, 490-498/14, 504/14,513/15,523/15,525/15,526/15,528/15,530/15 - 533/15, 536/15538/15,570/15: Peter Odiwuor Ngoge v Republic of Kenya, which were declared inadmissible for failure to satisfy the requirements of Article 56 (3) on the use of disparaging and insulting language, Article 56 (5) on exhaustion of local remedies, and Article 56 (6) on submission within a reasonable time from the exhaustion of local remedies. 26. The Commission also joint seven (7) Communications: 438/12 - 519/15 _ 534/15,458/13, 509/15, 514/15, 517/15, 520/15, 522/15 - Peter Odiwuor Ngoge v Republic of Kenya based on same Admissibility submissions which were also declared inadmissible for not meeting requirements under Articles 56 (3), 56 (5), and 56 (6). 27. A consideration of the Admissibility of the present Communications was deferred from the 58th to the 73rd Ordinary Session of the Commission. The Law on Admissibility Complainant's Submission on Admissibility 28. The Complainant submits that the conditions for Admissibility of the Communications, under Article 56 of the African Charter have been satisfied. The Complainant does not make submissions on the Communications compliance with Articles 56(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) and (7) of the African Charter. 29. The Complainant's arguments are mainly centered on Article 56(5) of the African Charter, in which he submits that he is unable to exhaust local remedies as they are unavailable, ineffective, and insufficient. He refers to [auiara v Gambia, in which the Commission elaborated on the aforementioned elements by holding that a remedy is considered available if the petitioner can pursue it without impediment, it is deemed effective if it offers a prospect of success, and it is found sufficient if it is capable of redressing the II complaint. II 2.