pending before a lawful Court in Rwanda and which Court is yet to issue a verdict on the said matter. That in any event, the EACJ should only be considered as a Court of last resort when National Courts are unwilling or unable to render justice to the people in their jurisdictions,otherwise,it will attract millions of cases that would ,in normal circumstance, be competently handled by Local Courts in Partner States. (v) The Government of Rwanda has at all times acted by the principles of good governance, including adherence to the principles of democracy, the rule of Law, Social Justice and maintenance of accepted Standards of Human Rights and so the Reference is without merit and should either be struck off or dismissed. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION 16. From the contested matters set out above and from the agreed issues as framed during the Scheduling Conference, the following questions ought to be determined: (a) Whether the East African Court of Justice’s (EACJ) First Instance Division has Jurisdiction to entertain the Reference herein. REFERENCE NO.8 OF 2010 Page 11

Sélectionner le paragraphe cible3