within which to submit on admissibility, failing which the Communication would be struck out for lack of diligent prosecution. 27.In a note verbale dated 27 October 2017 received at the Secretariat on 24 November 2017, the Respondent State indicated that the additional time had expired and thus requested the Commission to strike out the Communication. Analysis of the Commission to strike out 29. Rule 113 provides that when either party may apply to the,Co The Commission may grant a (1) month. o (2) months from the date -had expired on 04 July 2016. sent any evidence and arguments within was extended by the Commission for a pired on the 23 December 2016. on the admissibility of the above mentioned Communication. 32. More than three (3) months have lapsed since the expiry of the last extended period and no evidence and arguments have been submitted by the Complainant on the admissibility of the Communication. There is also evidence on record that the Complainant has received the letter granting further extension of time to submit on admissibility. ZZ aIOTSN ((@®* ps refeORET ARIap ¢ NN