the 1st Defendant, the Plaintiff and his adversary signatories to the said account ii. A situation where the Plaintiff’s adversary in court would be a cosignatory to the said account was unacceptable to the Plaintiff. iii. The 1st Defendant was not a party to whatever litigation that was pending so it could not possibly be a signatory to the said escrow account. iv. The tenancy agreement for the subject matter property was between the Plaintiff as landlord and the 1st Defendant as tenant and there was no judgment or order of court directing the Defendants to stop recognizing the Plaintiff as Landlord of the subject matter property. It was thus incumbent on the Defendants to pay the rents due to the Plaintiff to whom they had always paid previous rents. v. The Plaintiff once again demanded for the arrears of rent accrued and due to him for the tenancy years 2004/2005, 2005/2006. 2006/2007, 2007/2008 half year. In the event of the Defendants remaining recalcitrant the Plaintiff requested them to the said rent in their custody pending hearing and determination of the pending suit NO: CV/204/2004. The Plaintiff shall heavily rely on the said letter attached and marked Annexture 6 in the schedule of Annexture; 8