of Court for reinstatement of the Applicants sought under this supplementary Application is hereby declined. f. With regards to paragraph (e) on payment of salaries and other entitlements of the Applicants, having decided that the employment of the Applicants was unlawfully terminated, they are thus entitled to arrears of salaries and other entitlements. The Court concedes that it did not make a pronouncement on this head. The Court however notes that the quantum of the claim was not specifically established. A monetary claim particularly salaries which is within the knowledge of the Applicants must be sufficiently computed and pleaded to enable the Court make a definitive award. Despite this lapse, since the Respondent did not deny that the Applicants were in the employment of the Army within the stipulated period, they are entitled to arrears of salaries and other allowances due to them up to February 2016 as claimed in the Initiating Application when they were dismissed and the Court so holds. 15. The Court wishes to remark that at all times material, all deliberations in this case was heard by a three member panel and at no time was the case heard by two members as erroneously stated in paragraph (c) of the grounds in support of the Supplementary Application. While no issue was made of this by the Applicants nonetheless, the records of the Court must not be distorted. P. Decision 16. For the reasons stated above, the Community Court of Justice, sitting in public after hearing the parties, and their submissions duly considered in the light of the provisions of Article 63 and 64 of the Rules of the Community Court of Justice, ECOWAS decides as follows: i) The Supplementary Application is inadmissible under Article 63 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, ECOWAS. 13 | P a g e