the said Judgments do not show that the Applicant is a Party to the cases concerned. 19. The Court notes that at this stage of the proceedings, the Applicant has not produced evidence as to the exhaustion of local remedies within the meaning of Rule 34(4) of the Rules. 20. lt further notes that an Application must, inter alia, indicate proof of exhaustion of local remedies as set out in Rule 34 of the Rules. 21. ln the instant case, the Application indicates that local remedies have been exhausted; yet the evidence produced shows that there has been no such compliance in terms of the requirements set out in Rule 34(6) of the Rules. 22. ln view of the foregoing, the Court finds that the Application is not compliant with the provisions of Rule 34 of the Rules in regard to exhaustion of local remedies. 23. For these reasons, The COURT, Unanimously, Dismisses the Application for failure to comply with the requirements set forth in Rule 34 ( ) of the Rules; Accordingly orders that the Application be struck off the cause rist. Done at Arusha this Twenty-Eighth Day of the Month English and French, the French text being authoritative. of September 2017 in Signed: Sylvain ORE, President Robert ENO, Registrar DR0l15 5