iii VII. The Fourth Ground of Cross-Appeal By the Prosecution: the Trial Chamber’s Finding That All Crimes Against Humanity Require a Discriminatory Intent ………………………………………………..……123 A. Submissions of the Parties.......................................................................................... 123 1. The Prosecution Case.............................................................................................. 123 2. The Defence Case ................................................................................................... 124 B. Discussion................................................................................................................... 125 1. The Interpretation of the Text of Article 5 of the Statute........................................ 126 2. Article 5 and Customary International Law............................................................ 128 3. The Report of the Secretary-General ...................................................................... 131 4. The Statements Made by Some States in the Security Council .............................. 132 C. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 135 VIII. The Fifth Ground of Cross-Appeal by the Prosecution: Denial of the Prosecution’s Motion for Disclosure of Defence Witness Statements ...................................................................................... 136 A. Submissions of the Parties.......................................................................................... 136 1. The Prosecution Case.............................................................................................. 136 2. The Defence Case ................................................................................................... 138 B. Discussion................................................................................................................... 139 1. The Reason for Dealing with this Ground of the Cross-Appeal ............................. 139 2. The Power to Order the Disclosure of Prior Defence Witness Statements............. 140 C. Conclusion.................................................................................................................. 143 IX. Disposition .................................................................................................................... 144 X. Declaration of Judge Nieto-Navia…………………………………………….………..146 XI. Separate Opinion of Judge Shahabuddeen………………….……………..…………..150 ANNEX A - Glossary of Terms…………………………………………………………...169 Case No.: -94-1-A 15 July 1999