10 (iv) That the sentence of the Appellant be reviewed in the light of the relief sought under (iii) above. 2. The Cross-Appeal 25. In the Cross-Appeal the Prosecution seeks the following relief: (i) That the majority decision of the Trial Chamber at page 227, paragraph 607 of the Judgement, holding that the victims of the acts ascribed to the Appellant in Section III of the Judgement did not enjoy the protection of the prohibitions prescribed by the grave breaches regime applicable to civilians in the hands of a party to an armed conflict of which they are not nationals (which falls under Article 2 of the Statute of the Tribunal), be reversed. 46 (ii) That the finding of the Trial Chamber at page 132, paragraph 373 of the Judgement, that it could not, on the evidence before it, be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the Appellant had played any part in the killing of any of the five men from the village of Jaskici, be reversed. 47 (iii) That the decision of the Trial Chamber at pages 252-253, paragraph 656 of the Judgement, that in order to be found guilty of a crime against humanity the Prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the Appellant not only formed the intent to commit the underlying offence but also knew of the context of the widespread or systematic attack on the civilian population and that the act was not taken for purely personal reasons unrelated to the armed conflict, be reversed. 48 (iv) That the decision of the Trial Chamber at page 250, paragraph 652 of the Judgement, that discriminatory intent is an ingredient of all crimes against humanity under Article 5 of the Statute, be reversed. 49 (v) That the Witness Statements Decision be reviewed. 50 46 Notice of Cross-Appeal, p. 3. Ibid., p. 4. 48 Ibid. 49 Ibid. 47 Case No.: -94-1-A 15 July 1999