Achpr33 244 01 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Damages and Compensation
- Detention Facilities/Conditions
- Discrimination
- False Imprisonment
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Opinion
- Personal Liberty
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Information
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- This complaint follows the trial and conviction by the Supreme Security Court of the Respondent State in May 2001 of Professor Saadeddin Ibrahim, Director and Chair of the Board of Directors of the Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies, who was also treasurer ofHay’at Da’am al-Nakhibat(Association for the Support of Women Voters, known in Egypt as ‘Hoda Association’), together with twenty-seven (27) other persons, including the six (6) other individuals mentioned above. They were all working either as permanent employees or project associates of the two organisations and ten (10) of them were tried in absentia.
- Country
- Egypt
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Egypt: 26° 49′ 14″ N, 30° 48′ 9″ E
Document
11. 355 07 Hossam Ezzat & Rania Enayet (represented by Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights & INTERIGHTS) v The Arab Republic of Egypt
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Discrimination
- Domestic/National Laws
- Freedom of Religion
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Right to an Identity
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Rights of Minority Communities
- إقامة العدل
- Case Head Notes
- They submit that in April 2004, the victims approached the Immigration and Passports Department of the Ministry of Interior to list their three daughters on Ms Enayet’s passport. The Department agreed to add the daughters to their mother’s passport only if the applicants’ put a dash in front of “religion” on the passport application. This was complied with by the applicants and the passport was received. However, in May 2004, the Civil Status Intelligence Unit in Alexandria summoned Ms Enayet. She went with her husband and met with an officer who told them to change the religion entered on their IDs and on their daughters’ birth certificates. Their ID cards were confiscated during the meeting.
- Country
- Egypt
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 2: Freedom from Discrimination
- ACHPR 3: Right to Equality before the Law and Equal Protection of the Law
- Country Geolocation
- Egypt: 26° 49′ 14″ N, 30° 48′ 9″ E
Document
670 17 Fadhl Al Mawla Husni Ahmed Ismail and 19 Ors (represented by Freedom and Justice Party of Egypt) v Arab Republic of Egypt
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Personal Liberty
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Life
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- المقبولية
- Case Head Notes
- The Secretariat of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' rights received a complaint on 21 November 2017 from the Freedom and Justice Party of Egypt (the Complainant), on behalf of Fadhl Al Mawla Husni Ahmed Ismail and nineteen Others, against the Arab Republic of Egypt (Respondent State). The Complaint alleged violations of Articles 4, 6 and 7 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. The Commission declared the Communication inadmissible for failure to comply with Article 56 (1).
- Country
- Egypt
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Egypt: 26° 49′ 14″ N, 30° 48′ 9″ E
Document
Legal Resources Foundation v. Zambia, Decision, 211 of 98 (ACmHPR, May. 07, 2001)
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Discrimination
- Equality
- Participation in Government
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Case Head Notes
- The Respondent State is alleged to have violated Articles 2, 3, 13 and 19 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights in that the Constitution of Zambia Amendment Act of 1996 is discriminatory. The Commission decided on the merits that the Respondent State violated Articles 2, 3 (1) and 13 of the African Charter.
- Country
- Zambia
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 13 : Right to Participate in Government
- ACHPR 2: Freedom from Discrimination
- ACHPR 3.1: Equality before the law
- Country Geolocation
- Zambia: 13° 8′ 2″ S, 27° 50′ 58″ E
Document
002 2016 George Maili Kemboge v. United Republic of Tanzania Summary
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- amicus curiae
- Child Abuse
- Exhaustion of Local Remedies
- Freedom of Association
- Rape
- Relationship between AU mechanisms
- Reparations / Remedies
- Revision of Judgment
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Health
- Rights and Welfare of the Child
- Sexual and Gender Based Violence
- Sexual Offences
- Transitional Justice
- المقبولية
- مصلحة الطفل الفضلى
- Case Head Notes
- The request for Advisory opinion is submitted by the Socio Economic Rights and Accountability Project on the basis of clarifying whether the organization is recognized by the AU. SERAP argues it should be recognized by the African Union on the basis that is an African organization that is registered in Nigeria. SERAP also argues that due to its observer status with the African Commission it has the competence to request an opinion relating to any question within the scope of the ACFPR. But since SERAP doesn’t have a memorandum of understanding with the African union, it isn’t entitled to bring a request for advisory opinion before the court. The Court couldn’t give an opinion on the request due to not having personal jurisdiction.
- Country
- Tanzania
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 16 : Right to Health
- ACHPR 3: Right to Equality before the Law and Equal Protection of the Law
- ACHPR 3.1: Equality before the law
- Country Geolocation
- Tanzania: 6° 22′ 9″ S, 34° 53′ 20″ E
Document
Communication 416.12 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Competence of the Court
- Complicity in Crime
- Damages and Compensation
- Due Diligence
- Fraud
- Implementation of Decision
- Inadequate Legal Provisions
- Jurisdiction
- Mismanagement of Public Resources
- Personal Liberty
- Personal security
- Reparations / Remedies
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Information
- Theft
- إقامة العدل
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- المقبولية
- Case Head Notes
- The Complaint was submitted against the Republic of Cameroon(the Respondent State or Cameroon), a State Party to the African Charter.
- Country
- Cameroon
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 6 : Right to Personal Liberty and Protection from Arbitrary Arrest
- ACHPR 7.1.b : Innocent Until Proven Guilty
- ACHPR 7.1.c: Right to Defence
- ACHPR 7.1.d: Right to be tried within a Reasonable Time by Impartial Court
- Country Geolocation
- Cameroon: 7° 22′ 11″ N, 12° 21′ 17″ E
Document
Achpr47 313 05 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Civil and Political Rights
- Damages and Compensation
- Discrimination
- Domestic/National Laws
- Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- Expulsion from Country of Citizenship
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Movement
- Freedom of Opinion
- Human Rights Violations
- Inadequate Legal Provisions
- Peace and Security
- Personal Liberty
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Refugees / Asylum Seekers
- Regional Human Rights Laws
- Regional Judicial Body
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Information
- Rights of Non-Nationals
- Case Head Notes
- The complaint states that Mr Kenneth Good, an Australian national, teaching at the University of Botswana, had his employment terminated after his expulsion from Botswana on 31st May 2005.
- Country
- Botswana
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 9 : Right to Receive Information and Free Expression
- ACHPR 1 - General Obligations
- ACHPR 12.4: Condition for Expulsion on Non-Nationals
- ACHPR 18.1: Protection of women and children
- ACHPR 18.2: Assistance to family
- ACHPR 2: Freedom from Discrimination
- ACHPR 7.1.a: Right to Sue for Remedy before a Competent Tribunal
- Country Geolocation
- Botswana: 22° 19′ 43″ S, 24° 41′ 6″ E
Document
Achpr33 261 02 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Declaration
- Keywords
- Competence of the Court
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Discrimination
- Equality
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Opinion
- Judicial Independence
- Participation in Government
- Personal Liberty
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Health
- Right to Life
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The complaint is submitted by INTERIGHTS representing the Pan-African Movement (PAM), the Legal Resources Consortium (LRC), the Legal Defence and [Assistance] Project (LEDAP) and Recontre Africaine pour la Defense des Droits de l’Homme (RADDHO) wh[ich] filed the same on behalf of Professor Saadeddin Mohammed Ibrahim, head of the Ibn Khaldun Centre for Development Studies (IKC) and twenty-seven (27) other persons.
- Country
- Egypt
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Egypt: 26° 49′ 14″ N, 30° 48′ 9″ E
Document
Communication 349 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Discrimination
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Movement
- Judicial Independence
- Personal Liberty
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Information
- Right to Nationality and Nationality Rights
- Rights and Welfare of the Child
- Women's Rights
- Case Head Notes
- The Complaint is submitted against the State of Eritrea (the Respondent State) by Simon Weldehaimanot (the Complainant)on his own behalf,and on behalf of Eritrean youths.
- Country
- Eritrea
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Eritrea: 15° 10′ 46″ N, 39° 46′ 56″ E
Document
Achpreos11 278 03 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Competence of the Court
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- Equality
- False Imprisonment
- Inadequate Legal Provisions
- Judicial Independence
- Military Tribunals
- Murder/Assassination
- Personal Liberty
- Pregnant women / mothers (with infant) in conflict with the law
- Provisional/interim measures
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Life
- Right to Property
- Rights and Welfare of the Child
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- Women in prison
- Women's Rights
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complaint is brought against the Democratic Republic of Congo (herein after referred to as the DRC or the Respondent State),on behalf of Mrs.Masumbuko Mwali Anne Marie, Mrs. Chibalonza Balole Coco, Mrs. Kamwanya Beya Rose, Mrs. Fono Onokoko Péguy, Mrs. Nabintu Marcelline and Mrs. Atandjo Otshudi (the Victims), who are all Congolese citizens.
- Country
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Democratic Republic of the Congo: 4° 2′ 18″ S, 21° 45′ 31″ E
Document
Etoungou Nko’o on behalf of Mr and Mrs. Elogo Menye and Rev Daniel Ezo’o Ayo V. the Government of Cameroon.
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Ruling
- Keywords
- Right to Life
- Case Head Notes
- The complainants, in their submission to the Committee, allege that TFA, aged 10, was raped on the 9, 12, 15 and 16 of April, 2012, in Amanda - North-West region of Cameroon. The violation was then reported by Ms. Tebid Ruthda, the aunt of the victim, who officially filed the case before the local police. The complainants allege that the police requested a medical examination of the victim which included an HIV test. The medical examination confirmed that she had been raped and a medical certificate to that effect was obtained from the hospital by victim‟s aunt.
- Country Accused
- Cameroon
- Outcome
- Ruled inadmissible
ACERWC Decision on Communication
TFA decision ACERWC
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- IHRDA
- Rape
- Rights and Welfare of the Child
- Women's Rights
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants, in their submission to the Committee, allege that TFA, aged 10, was raped on9, 12, 15 and 16 of April, 2012, in Amanda -North-West region of Cameroon.
- Country Accused
- Cameroon
- Outcome
- Decided on Merits
- Year Decided
- 6 مايو 2018
- Rights Violated
- ACRWC 1.1: States to recognize rights, freedoms and duties in the Charter and take steps to adopt implementation measures
- ACRWC 1.2: No Charter provision to precede more conducive domestic laws for child rights and welfare
- ACRWC 1.3: Discouraging custom, tradition, cultural or religious practice inconsistent Charter provisions
- ACRWC 16: Protection against child abuse and torture
- ACRWC 16.1: Protecting child from torture, inhuman or degrading treatment
- ACRWC 16.2: Establishing special monitoring units for child abuse and support to children
- ACRWC 3: Every child is entitled to enjoyment of rights and freedoms in irrespective of race, ethnic group, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national and social origin, fortune, birth or other status
ACERWC Decision on Communication
African Centre of Justice and Peace Studies (ACJPS) and People’s Legal Aid Centre (PLACE) V. the Government of Republic of Sudan
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Domestic/National Laws
- Inadequate Legal Provisions
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Nationality and Nationality Rights
- Rights and Welfare of the Child
- Statelessness
- مصلحة الطفل الفضلى
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants submitted that on 19 July 2011, the National Assembly of the Republic of Sudan adopted amendments to the Sudan Nationality Act of 1994. These amendments entered into force on 10 August 2011 following signature of the President of the Republic of Sudan. These amendments provide for, among others, the automatic revocation of Sudanese nationality of those who became citizens of the Republic of South Sudan. The amendments further provide that Sudanese nationality shall be revoked where the Sudanese nationality of the responsible parent is revoked because of de facto or de jure entitlement to South Sudanese nationality. According to the nationality laws of the Respondent State, dual nationality with South Sudan is not permitted.
- Country Accused
- Sudan
- Outcome
- Decided on Merits
- Year Decided
- 31 مايو 2018
- Rights Violated
- ACRWC 11: Education
- ACRWC 3: Every child is entitled to enjoyment of rights and freedoms in irrespective of race, ethnic group, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national and social origin, fortune, birth or other status
- ACRWC 4: In all actions concerning the child undertaken by any person or authority the best interests of the child shall be the primary consideration
- ACRWC 6.3: Every child has the right to acquire a nationality
ACERWC Decision on Communication
Achpr50 375 09 eng.pdf
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Discrimination
- Equality
- Inheritance/Succession
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Right of Women to Inheritance
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Property
- Right to Work
- Rights and Welfare of the Child
- Women's Rights
- إقامة العدل
- مصلحة الطفل الفضلى
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants submit that the Victim was married in 1964 to Mr. Peter Echaria, a Kenyan diplomat who served in Moscow, Washington D C and Addis Ababa before returning to Kenya. They state that due to the diplomatic status of Mr. Peter Echaria, the Victim was not allowed to work.
- Country
- Kenya
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Kenya: 0° 1′ 25″ S, 37° 54′ 22″ E
Document
Achpreo6 284 03 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Civil and Political Rights
- Competence of the Court
- Damages and Compensation
- Domestic/National Laws
- Equality
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Opinion
- Protection of Privacy
- Provisional/interim measures
- Regional Human Rights Laws
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Information
- Right to Privacy
- Right to Property
- Right to Work
- إقامة العدل
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants state that a new media law - the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy Act (AIPPA)was enacted in 2002 by the Respondent State. They claim that section 66 of AIPPA read together with section 72 purports to prohibit “mass media services” from operating until they have registered with the Media and Information Commission (MIC).
- Country
- Zimbabwe
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 1 - General Obligations
- ACHPR 14: Right to Property
- ACHPR 15 : Right to Work
- ACHPR 9.2 : Right to Express and Disseminate Opinions Within the Law
- Country Geolocation
- Zimbabwe: 19° 0′ 56″ S, 29° 9′ 17″ E
Document
Achpr48 305 05 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Civil and Political Rights
- Coercion / Duress
- Discrimination
- Domestic/National Laws
- Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Opinion
- Jurisdiction
- Personal Liberty
- Personal security
- Protection of Privacy
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Information
- Right to Property
- Right to Self-Determination
- Right to Work
- إقامة العدل
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants aver that Capital Radio Private Limited (CRPL) is a private company incorporated in the Respondent State seeking to provide broadcasting services within Zimbabwe. They submit that despite repeated efforts, CRPL still cannot broadcast in Zimbabwe due to legal restrictions and political opposition that allows the state broadcaster to enjoy broadcasting monopoly.
- Country
- Zimbabwe
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Zimbabwe: 19° 0′ 56″ S, 29° 9′ 17″ E
Document
Achpr46 276 03 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Civil and Political Rights
- Damages and Compensation
- Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- Forced Eviction
- Free Disposal of Wealth and Natural Resources
- Freedom of Religion
- Internal Displacement
- Land Expropriation
- Land Rights
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Provisional/interim measures
- Regional Human Rights Laws
- Right to Education
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Property
- Rights of Minority Communities
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants allege that the Government of Kenya in violation of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (hereinafter the African Charter), the Constitution of Kenya and international law, forcibly removed the Endorois from their ancestral lands around the Lake Bogoria area of the Baringo and Koibatek Administrative Districts, as well as in the Nakuru and Laikipia Administrative Districts within the Rift Valley Province in Kenya, without proper prior consultations, adequate and effective compensation.
- Country
- Kenya
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 1 - General Obligations
- ACHPR 14: Right to Property
- ACHPR 17 : Right to Education
- ACHPR 21: Right to Free Disposal of Wealth and Natural Resources
- ACHPR 22: Peoples' Right to Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- ACHPR 8: Right to Freedom of Conscience
- Country Geolocation
- Kenya: 0° 1′ 25″ S, 37° 54′ 22″ E
Document
Achpr33 241 01 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Damages and Compensation
- Discrimination
- Equality
- Exhaustion of Local Remedies
- Freedom of Association
- Freedom of Movement
- Participation in Government
- Personal Liberty
- Personal security
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Regional Human Rights Laws
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Health
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants allege that legislation governing mental health in The Gambia is outdated.
- Country
- Gambia
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 13.1: Right to participate freely in government
- ACHPR 16 : Right to Health
- ACHPR 18.4: Protection of the aged and the disabled
- ACHPR 2: Freedom from Discrimination
- ACHPR 3: Right to Equality before the Law and Equal Protection of the Law
- ACHPR 5: Cruel Inhuman and Degrading Treatment
- ACHPR 7.1.a: Right to Sue for Remedy before a Competent Tribunal
- ACHPR 7.1.c: Right to Defence
- Country Geolocation
- Gambia: 13° 26′ 35″ N, 15° 18′ 37″ W
Document
Achpr34 256 02 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Exhaustion of Local Remedies
- Freedom of Movement
- Military Tribunals
- Personal Liberty
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Work
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants allege that in the afternoon of 24th June 2002, plain-cloth[ed] state security officers from the National Police Force, National Security Agency, National Bureau of Investigation, Fire Service, Immigration, Ministry of Defence, Anti-Terrorist Unit, Special Security Service, and Ministry of National Security arrested Hassan Bility, Ansumana Kamara and Mohammed Kamara, all journalists working for the independent Analyst Newspaper in Monrovia
- Country
- Liberia
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Liberia: 6° 25′ 41″ N, 9° 25′ 46″ W
Document
Achpr45 279.03 296.05 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Child Abuse
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Damages and Compensation
- Discrimination
- Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- Equality
- Extra-Judicial Killings
- Forced Eviction
- Freedom of Expression
- Inadequate Legal Provisions
- Indigenous Communities
- Internal Displacement
- Massive Human Rights Violations
- Military Offences
- Military Tribunals
- Militia operations / Armed conflicts
- Murder/Assassination
- Participation in Government
- Peace and Security
- Personal Liberty
- Personal security
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Provisional/interim measures
- Rape
- Refugees / Asylum Seekers
- Reparations / Remedies
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Education
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Health
- Right to Information
- Right to Life
- Right to Property
- Sexual and Gender Based Violence
- Sexual Offences
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- Transitional Justice
- Use of force
- Violations Resulting from Warfare and Military Operations
- Women's Rights
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainants allege gross, massive and systematic violations of human rights by the Republic of Sudan (herein after called Respondent State) against the indigenous Black African tribes in the Darfur region (Western Sudan); in particular, members of the Fur, Marsalit and Zaghawa tribes.
- Country
- Sudan
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 7.1 : Right to be Heard
- ACHPR 1 - General Obligations
- ACHPR 12:2: Right to leave any country including his own, and to return to his country
- ACHPR 12.1: Right to freedom of movement and residence within borders of State of legal residence
- ACHPR 14: Right to Property
- ACHPR 16 : Right to Health
- ACHPR 18.1: Protection of women and children
- ACHPR 22: Peoples' Right to Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- ACHPR 4: Right to Life and Intergrity
- ACHPR 5: Cruel Inhuman and Degrading Treatment
- ACHPR 6 : Right to Personal Liberty and Protection from Arbitrary Arrest
- Country Geolocation
- Sudan: 12° 51′ 46″ N, 30° 13′ 3″ E
Document
Communication No.: 697/18 M. Kaptue Tagne Serges Bruces v. Republic of Cameroon
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Discrimination
- Judicial Independence
- Personal Liberty
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Case Head Notes
- The complainant, Mr. Kaptue Tagne Serges Bruces, alleged that criminal proceedings instituted against him in Cameroon violated several guarantees under the African Charter, including his rights to liberty, equality before the law, a fair trial, and judicial independence. After examining the merits, the African Commission concluded that while some of the Applicant's fair trial claims were not established, Cameroon had violated the Charter by unlawfully depriving him of his liberty, failing to guarantee a hearing within a reasonable time, failing to ensure the independence of the judiciary, and failing to comply with its general obligations under the Charter
- Country
- Cameroon
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 1 - General Obligations
- ACHPR 26 : Duty to Guarantee Independence of Courts
- ACHPR 6 : Right to Personal Liberty and Protection from Arbitrary Arrest
- ACHPR 7.1.d: Right to be tried within a Reasonable Time by Impartial Court
- Country Geolocation
- Cameroon: 7° 22′ 11″ N, 12° 21′ 17″ E
Document
Communication No.: 833/24 - Apôtre Joseph Kiiwa Nsenga v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- المقبولية
- Case Head Notes
- The complainant, Apôtre Joseph Kiiwa Nsenga, lodged a communication against the Democratic Republic of the Congo alleging violations of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Before considering the merits, the African Commission examined whether the communication complied with the admissibility requirements under Article 56 of the African Charter. The Commission concluded that the communication failed to satisfy the requirements of Article 56(3) (compatibility with the Constitutive Act of the African Union and the African Charter) and Article 56(5) (exhaustion of local remedies). Consequently, it declared the communication inadmissible and did not proceed to examine the alleged violations on the merits.
- Country
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Democratic Republic of the Congo: 4° 2′ 18″ S, 21° 45′ 31″ E
Document
Achpr11eo decis 340 07 zimbabwe 2012 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Declaration
- Keywords
- Competence of the Court
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Discrimination
- Enforced disappearance
- Freedom of Association
- Freedom of Expression
- Freedom of Movement
- Freedom of Opinion
- Human Rights Violations
- Judicial Independence
- Kidnapping/Sequestration
- Militia operations / Armed conflicts
- Personal Liberty
- Personal security
- Protection of Privacy
- Rape
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Health
- Right to Life
- Right to Privacy
- Right to Property
- Sexual Offences
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainant submits that on 14 April 2006 on or about 19:00 hrs at Takunda Butchery in Glen Norah B (a residential suburb in Harare, Zimbabwe) the Victim was approached and forcibly pushed into a van by one Major Kembo (who is believed to be a member of the Military Intelligence in the Zimbabwe Defense Force), Mr. Makwande, and Ms Angie of Carrbritte Army Camp. The Complainant alleges that after the assailants forced him into the van, they drove away to an unknown destination.
- Country
- Zimbabwe
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 56.5: Exhaustion of local remedies
- ACHPR 56.6. Submission within reasonable period
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Zimbabwe: 19° 0′ 56″ S, 29° 9′ 17″ E
Document
Communication 389.10 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Coercion / Duress
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Damages and Compensation
- Human Rights Violations
- Implementation of Decision
- Inadequate Legal Provisions
- Land Rights
- Police Brutality and Offences
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Health
- Right to Property
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- Use of force
- إقامة العدل
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainant submits that following a mandate entrusted to a law firm in Yaoundé, she and her husband were informed on 6 June 2007 that a 2,000 m² plot of land located in a residential neighbourhood in Yaoundé was on sale. After verifying the documents in the possession of the vendor’s notary, Mr Pierre Firmin ADDA, a notary in Yaoundé, the Complainant and her husband were informed that there was no opposition to the sale of the plot of land.On 8 June 2007, the firm, on their behalf, negotiated with the vendor for the purchase of an area of 500 m² valued at 22,500,000 (twenty-two million five hundred thousand) CFA francs.
- Country
- Cameroon
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 1 - General Obligations
- ACHPR 14: Right to Property
- ACHPR 16 : Right to Health
- ACHPR 18 : Protection of the Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Country Geolocation
- Cameroon: 7° 22′ 11″ N, 12° 21′ 17″ E
Document
Achpr46 310 05 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Competence of the Court
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Damages and Compensation
- Discrimination
- Domestic/National Laws
- Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- Freedom of Religion
- Human Rights Violations
- Implementation of Decision
- Impunity
- Inadequate Legal Provisions
- Judicial Independence
- Non Compliance
- Personal Liberty
- Reparations / Remedies
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Health
- Right to Property
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainant states that the victims were hired by the Iraqi - owned Southern Oil Company in the early 1980s as drivers, mechanics, electricians, cooks, servants and manual workers in the oil fields of the said company in Basra City (Southern Iraq).
- Country
- Sudan
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Sudan: 12° 51′ 46″ N, 30° 13′ 3″ E
Document
Achpr37 268 03 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Corruption
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Discrimination
- Economic, Social and Cultural Development
- Equality
- Fraud
- Free Disposal of Wealth and Natural Resources
- Freedom of Movement
- Human Rights Violations
- Impunity
- Peace and Security
- Personal Liberty
- Personal security
- Protection of Family and Vulnerable Groups
- Right to a General Satisfactory Environment
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Equality Before the Law
- Right to Life
- Right to Self-Determination
- Right to Work
- Trafficking / Use of contraband
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainant states that in 1999, he exposed the smuggling activities of several companies and individuals, and officials of the Customs and Excise, Police and various other officials to President Obasanjo of Nigeria and the Inspector General of Police.
- Country
- Nigeria
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Nigeria: 9° 4′ 55″ N, 8° 40′ 31″ E
Document
🇨🇲 Communication No.: 688/18 Atemnkeng Richard (represented by Mbufor Fonju John Law Firm) v. Republic of Cameroon
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- المقبولية
- Case Head Notes
- The complainant lodged a communication against the Republic of Cameroon alleging violations of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights. Before considering the substance of the allegations, the African Commission examined whether the communication satisfied the admissibility requirements under Article 56 of the African Charter. The Commission found that the complainant had not exhausted local remedies as required by Article 56(5) and therefore declared the communication inadmissible without examining the merits
- Country
- Cameroon
- Rights Violated
- None Indicated
- Country Geolocation
- Cameroon: 7° 22′ 11″ N, 12° 21′ 17″ E
Document
17. 434 12 Filimao Pedro Tivane (represented by Dr. Simeao Cuamba) v. Mozambique
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Damages and Compensation
- Detention Facilities/Conditions
- Exhaustion of Local Remedies
- Land Expropriation
- Protection of Privacy
- Rent Disputes
- Right to Fair Trial
- Right to Privacy
- Right to Property
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainant avers that on 14 January 1976 a senior official of the party-led State Committee, accompanied by police agents, arrested the Victim without a warrant and forcibly took him to the “Sacuzo Concentration Camp in Sofala Provinceand subsequently to the Intoculo Concentration Camp in Nampula Province, (these camps are commonly known as re-education centres),”2where he remained in detention until 03 August 1988. The Complainant submits that at the time of the Victim’s arrest, the Respondent State took possession of the Victim’s house and leased it to the Embassy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR).
- Country
- Mozambique
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 56.5: Exhaustion of local remedies
- Country Geolocation
- Mozambique: 18° 39′ 57″ S, 35° 31′ 46″ E
Document
Achpr33 222.98 229.99 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Decision
- Keywords
- Competence of the Court
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Damages and Compensation
- Exhaustion of Local Remedies
- False Imprisonment
- Human Rights Violations
- Judicial Independence
- Military Tribunals
- Militia operations / Armed conflicts
- Peace and Security
- Personal Liberty
- Personal security
- Reparations / Remedies
- Right to be Heard
- Right to Dignity
- Right to Information
- Torture and Ill Treatment
- الاعتقال والاحتجاز التعسفي
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainant alleges that these individuals were arrested on 1st July 1998 or around this date and that they weredetained by the Government of Sudan without charge and were refused contact with their lawyers or their families.
- Country
- Sudan
- Rights Violated
- ACHPR 7.1 : Right to be Heard
- ACHPR 5: Cruel Inhuman and Degrading Treatment
- ACHPR 6 : Right to Personal Liberty and Protection from Arbitrary Arrest
- ACHPR 7.1.a: Right to Sue for Remedy before a Competent Tribunal
- ACHPR 7.1.b : Innocent Until Proven Guilty
- ACHPR 7.1.c: Right to Defence
- ACHPR 7.1.d: Right to be tried within a Reasonable Time by Impartial Court
- Country Geolocation
- Sudan: 12° 51′ 46″ N, 30° 13′ 3″ E
Document
Achpr29 207 97 eng
- Preview

- Type of Document
- Declaration
- Keywords
- Child Abuse
- Cruel and Degrading Treatment
- Education
- Right to a General Satisfactory Environment
- Right to Education
- Slavery and Human Trafficking
- Case Head Notes
- The Complainant alleges that the above-mentioned minor is reported to have been fraudulently taken out of his country of origin, Malawi, and subjected to working conditions close to slavery in The Gambia by someone called Collyer, a British national.
- Country
- Gambia
- Country Geolocation
- Gambia: 13° 26′ 35″ N, 15° 18′ 37″ W
Document
30 مبين 1458 الكيانات