and that in the same manner, therefore, the Court can only interpret a point which is part of the operative provisions of the judgment in question. The operative provisions of the judgment of 21 June 2013 follows: « The Court declares this application inadmissible Article 6(2) of the (paragraph 41). Protocol, read with Article 56 (5) provides as in terms of of the Charter » The Applicant’s request for the interpretation of Article 28(1) of the Protocol and Rule 59(2) of the Rules mentioned above is in no way related to these operative provisions which have to do with the inadmissibility of the application for failure to exhaust local remedies. It is even strictly unrelated to the reasons of the judgment. It concerns an issue which is outside the scope of the judgment. Besides, the Court itself had just admitted this in one of the preceding paragraphs of its judgment where it declared that « [I]he eight ‘points’ posed by the Applicant can never be points for interpretation as they do not relate to the operative paragraphs of the judgment» (paragraph 7). 7. The Court justifies its decision to consider this point affirmation it just made, in saying that there was a need in spite of the to remove any doubt on the issue. This justification is however not convincing. The same need to remove any doubt could also be felt in relation to the six other points raised by the Applicant in his application for interpretation which the Court however decided to ignore; and the Court also failed to explain why the interpretation of Article 28(1) and Rule 59(2) had to be treated differently from the other points. The selection of points which the Court did not have to interpret, but which it nevertheless interpreted, necessarily appears to be arbitrary. 8. Further, parts of the judgment in which the Court gives its interpretation of Article 28(1) of the Protocol and Rule 59(2) of the Rules do not even constitute obiter dicta. It is generally acknowledged judgment. Obiter dictum is that a judge may include obiter dicta in his a Latin expression which means ‘said in Ze (we