2. The defendant do pay to the 7 plaintiffs, the other beneficiaries on Court record and to all other persons who were on the staff of the former East African Community and its institutions and Corporations on 30June 1977, all claims as stated in page 3 of the Deed of Settlement to be made on the basis of the plaintiffs and other said payees’ employment record”. 107. It is alleged that when employees, based on what “the Government lawful entitlements therefore parties, the Respondent the as in accordance orders 5,598 Applicants before began considered to be their with the Deed of Settlement, of the Court’, a dispute the 31,831 ex-employees, of this Court. Those to pay the ex- arose ex-employees and between the including the “felt the that payments made to them did not fully reflect what they were entitled to under the Deed of Settlement”. The parties confronted each other in the High Court on several occasions. 108. On 15 application October before the 2010, the High Court 5,598 as ex-employees they claim they filed an were not satisfied in the manner the Deed of Settlement was executed by the Respondent, claiming that some of the 15 claims in the Deed were not settled by the Respondent. The 5, 598 claimants, who include the Applicants before this Court, returned to the High Court and applied for a Certificate of Payment, for the execution of the Deed. The matter was heard by dusts janaliag ie; but before he could deliver ruling, he recused himselt_ x =e 2 l a 7 — Ng -—7 —_ @ eo