.f' 00 0 32? A. Conditions of admissibility in contention between the Parties 39.While some of the above conditions are not in contention between the Parties, the Respondent State has raised objections relating to the non-disclosure of the Applicants' identities, the incompatibility of the Application with the Constitutive Act of the African Union, the use of insulting and disparaging language and the nonexhaustion of local remedies. i. Objection relating to non-disclosure of the Applicant's identities 40.The Respondent State argues that the Application should be declared inadmissible because it does not meet the requirement of Article 56(1) of the Charter and Rule 40(1) of the Rules on the identification of the authors of the application. lt also argues that the Application is inadmissible because the Applicants state that the passports of other Rwandans were also invalidated. 41.The Applicants did not respond to this claim 42.The Court notes that the Application has been filed by seven (7) Applicants, Kennedy Alfred Nurudiin Gihana, Kayumba Nyamwasa, Bamporiki Abdallah Seif, Frank Ntwali, SafariStanley, Dr. Etienne Mutabaziand Epimaque Ntamushobora, who are clearly identified. The reference to 'other Rwandans' does not negate this fact as they are not before this Court and are not part of this Application. 43.The Court finds that the seven (7) Applicants are properly identified in accordance with Article 56(1)of the Charterand Rule40(1)of the Rules. The RespondentState's objection in this regard is therefore dismissed. 10