protected under Article 2 of the Charter, (C) the alleged violation of the right to equality before the law and the right to equal protection of the law, protected under Article 3 of the Charter, (D) the violation of the right to life, protected under Article 4 of the Charter, and, finally, (E) the violation of the right to dignity, guaranteed under Article 5 of the Charter. A. Alleged violation of the right to have one’s cause heard 70. The Court observes, from the record, that the Applicant essentially raises two (2) grievances against the domestic courts, whose actions or omissions he claims violated his right to be heard as protected under Article 7(1) of the Charter. These grievances are: i. The evidence based on which he was convicted was not properly examined and evaluated; and ii. His application for review of the Court of Appeal’s judgment was unjustly denied. 71. The Court will proceed to examine these two (2) grievances in light of Article 7(1) of the Charter. i. Allegation that evidence was not properly examined and evaluated 72. The Applicant alleges that both the trial and appellate courts completely misapprehended the substance and quality of the evidence, resulting in an unfair conviction, considering that the evidence used to convict him was doubtful and lacked credibility. 73. Specifically, the Applicant claims that his conviction was based on a misdirection on points of law considering that it was based on an extrajudicial statement of the Applicant and the co-accused (P-8 and P-9), as well as on allegedly stolen articles (P-7), which were admitted and considered by the trial court and upheld by the Court of Appeal. 17