b. An order of certiorari to quash an order of the third respondent, that is, the Resident Magistrate Moshi, committing the Applican1s for trial before the High Court; c. An order of certiorari to quash the illegal and unlawful actions of the first and second respondents, that is, the Inspector General of Police and the Director of Immigration services, and all the criminal charges and prosecutions in the aforementioned four criminal cases, which are grounded on the patently illegal and unlawful actions of the said first and second respondents; d. An order of prohibition , to prohibit the third and fourth respondents from hearing, or in any other way, determining all or any of the aforesaid criminal cases and or charges; e. An order for the immediate release of the Applicants from custody and for the restoration of their passports , unused air tickets (Maputo-Nairobi), Kenya identity cards, international certificates of vaccination , ATM cards, frequent flyer cards, US $29,047, KSh 28,000, four mobile phones, three golden rings , wrist watches and shoes; and f. Any other order the Court may deem fit and just to grant". 16. At the same time, the Respondent State filed Criminal Appeal No. 276 of 2006, against the High Court decision in Misc. Criminal Application No. 007 of 2006, which granted leave to the Applicants to file for orders of certiorari and prohibition . Proceedings in Criminal Application No. 16 of 2006 were therefore stayed pending the results of the Respondent State's appeal. 8