ii. Grant him pecuniary reparations, the amount of which will be determined according to the annual income of citizens, and this, over the period of his detention. 14. The Respondent State prays the Court to: i. Find that the Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the Application; ii. Find that the Application does not satisfy the admissibility requirements set out in Article 56(5) of the Charter; iii. Find that the Application has not met the admissibility requirements set out in Article 56(6) of the Charter; iv. Declare the Application inadmissible; v. Find that the Respondent State did not violate the Applicant’s rights protected under Article 2 of the Charter; vi. Find that the Respondent State did not violate the Applicant’s rights protected under Article 3(1) and (2) of the Charter; vii. Rule that the Application is unfounded and, consequently, dismiss it; and viii. Order that the Applicant serve his sentence and that he be paid no reparation. V. JURISDICTION 15. The Court notes that Article 3 of the Protocol provides as follows: 1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall extend to all cases and disputes submitted to it concerning the interpretation and Application of the Charter, this Protocol and any other relevant human rights instrument ratified by the States concerned. 2. In the event of a dispute as to whether the Court has jurisdiction, the Court shall decide. 16. Under Rule 49(1) of the Rules, “The Court shall conduct preliminary examination of its jurisdiction [...] in accordance with the Charter, the Protocol and these Rules”. 5