72.Whereas some of the above conditions are not in contention between the parties, the Respondent State raised objections relating to the language used in the Application and exhaustion of local remedies. A. Admissibility conditions which are not in contention between the Parties 73.The conditions regarding the identity of the Applicant, the Application’s compatibility with the Constitutive Act of the African Union and the Charter, the nature of the evidence, the time limit for seizure of the Court and the principle according to which an Application must not concern cases previously settled by the Parties (sub rules 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 of Rule 40 of the Rules and Article 56 of the Charter) are not in contention among the Parties. 74,The Court considers that nothing in the pleadings submitted before it by the Parties suggests that any of the foregoing conditions has not been met in the instant case. 75.The Court considers that the said conditions have been met in the instant case. B. The admissibility conditions in contention between the Parties 1) Objection to admissibility on the ground of the language used by the Applicant 76.In its additional observations, the Respondent State maintains that the Applicant’s written submissions contain insulting language towards it and its institutions. 19