the date on which the Judgment that is being sought to be reviewed was delivered. The second condition is that the party applying for a review must file his application within three months of discovering the fact/facts upon which his application is based. The final condition is that the application must be premised on the discovery of some fact/facts that is/are decisive, which fact/facts was/were unknown to the Court or the party claiming Revision provided that such ignorance was not due to negligence.” (see §64) 137. In the instant case, it is, therefore, necessary to verify whether, in the instant case, the conditions for the admissibility of an Application for Revision are met, which pursuant to the provisions of Article 25 of Protocol A/P.1/7/91 and 92 of the Court's Rules of Procedure, are as follows: a) The application made within five years after the decision was pronounced and within three months from the day on which the applicant became aware of the fact on which the application for Revision is based; b) The need to rely on a fact that is considered new; 138. The Judgment, which is the subject of the application for Revision, was delivered on July 8th, 2020, and served on the Applicants on July 14th, 2020, as they admit, and the present application for Revision was lodged on October 5th, 2020, that is, almost three months after the date of its delivery, so the Court considers that the temporal condition is met. 139. As for the second condition, the need to rely on a fact considered new, and it should be recalled that, as stated in article 25 of the Protocol mentioned above, such new fact discovered by the party must be able to "exerting a decisive influence on the decision, the ignorance of this fact not being due to the negligence of the Applicant, provided that this lack of knowledge is not the result of negligence." 26