74. Pursuant to Judgment No. ECW/CCJ/JUD/13/2020 of July 8th, 2020, the Court decided that: “a) It declares that it entertains jurisdiction to hear the case, which it deems admissible. b) The Applicants' property rights have not been violated by the Defendant State; the Applicants could not prove their property right over the said property. c) All other claims, which are dependent on the merits of the violation of the property right, are dismissed as unfounded…. 75. It is the Revision of this Decision that the Applicants seek from the Court. On the Preliminary Objection: Inadmissibility Exception of the Application for Revision 76. The Respondent maintains that: 77. The Applicants' application for Revision is based on Article 92 of the Rules of Procedure of the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice, which provides that: “An application for revision of a judgment shall be made within three months of the date on which the facts on which the application is based came to the applicant’s knowledge.” 78. Based on this text, the Applicants appealed to this Court, relying on three grounds that, in their opinion, militate in favor of the Revision of the Decision rendered on July 8th, 2020 by the Court, alleging: 15