iii. Payment of reparations in the amount of TSH100 000 000.00 (a hundred million Tanzanian shillings) for each, on account of moral damage suffered to compensate the Applicants for the loss in their dignity and reputation, as well as physical, mental and emotional harm; iv. Rehabilitation of the Applicant Bahati Mtega who is HIV positive in order to receive proper medical and psychological care; v. The Applicants also pray that the Respondent is ordered to amend its laws to ensure respect for dignity as enshrined under Article 5 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights by removing the corporal punishment in her statute books. * 81. The Respondent State, for its part, prays the Court to dismiss the matter in its entirety. *** 82. In the instant case, the Court has established that the Respondent State has violated the Applicants’ right to dignity, by reason of prescribing and applying corporal punishment, as well as the right to a fair trial by denying the Applicants free legal assistance during proceedings before domestic courts. It is in respect of these violations that it must assess the reparations due. A. Pecuniary reparations i. Material prejudice 83. As established in its jurisprudence, for the Court to grant reparations for material prejudice, there must be a causal link between the violation established and the prejudice suffered.37 It is thus important that there should be specification of the nature of the prejudice and proof thereof. 37 Kadumbagula and Another v. Tanzania (merits and reparations), supra, § 116. 21