v. 13. Mr. Elisha Suka Further, the parties were directed to provide additional documents within thirty (30) days from the date of the hearing. The Applicant was to.provide a copy of the Applicant’s Notice of Motion for Review of the decision of the Court of Appeal in Criminal Appeal Number 230 of 2008. The Respondent was to provide a certified copy of the record of proceedings in Criminal Appeal Number 230 of 2008 of the Court of Appeal and a certified copy of warrant of commitment on a sentence of imprisonment issued. 14. On 22 January 2015, PALU submitted the documents requested by the Court during the public hearing. 15. On 5 February 2015, the Respondent submitted to the Registrar, a certified copy of the record of proceedings at the Court of Appeal in Criminal Appeal Number 230 of 2008 and its observations on the authenticity of the copy of the Applicant’s Notice of Motion for Review of the decision ofthe Court of Appeal in Crimine! Appeal Number 230 of 2008 submitted to the Registrar by PALU. 16. On 24 February 2015, PALU objected to the Respondent's purported explanation of some of the issues arising from the record of proceedings in Criminal Application Number 230 of 2008. The Respondent did not respond to PALU’s contention. The decision of the Court on this objection follows in this judgment (infra paragraphs 79-80).