VII. JURISDICTION 29. This Application is founded on the alleged violation of the right to freedom of assembly, freedom of expression and freedom of movement guaranteed in Articles 11, 9 and 12 (1) of the African Charter respectively. In accordance with Article 9(4) of the Protocol A/P1/7/91 on the Community Court of Justice (Protocol), which provides, “The Court has jurisdiction to determine cases of violation of human rights that occur in any Member State.” The Court therefore holds that the Application being premised on the alleged violation of human rights, the Court has jurisdiction to adjudicate on the Application. 30. VIII. ADMISSIBILITY The admissibility of applications in this Court is provided for in Article 10(d) (i) and (ii) of the Supplementary Protocol 2005: “Access to the Court is open to…d) individuals on application for relief for violation of their human rights; the submission of application for which shall: i) not be anonymous; nor ii) be made whilst the same matter has been instituted before another International Court for adjudication.” 31.The Court holds that the Application is in compliance with Article 10 (d) (i) and (ii) of the Protocol, having found that it is neither anonymous nor made whilst the same matter has been instituted before another international court for adjudication. 32.It is imperative to state at this point that while Article 10(d) (i) and (ii) are statutory provisions enshrined in the Protocol for the determination of the admissibility of an application therein, they are not exhaustive as certain 11