refused and the. substantive case determined. He stated this Court cannot sit on appeal on cases decided upon by the National Court and he further deposed that the plaintiff would not in this case be prejudiced if the application is refused. 36. The 2nd defendant filed a motion on notice dated 28th January 2014 for extension of time to file a defence against the plaintiffs' claim. ANALYSIS OF THE PRELIMINARY POINT Having considered the facts deposed to by the 2nd plaintiff and the 1st defendant's counsel on the application for interim injunction, it is pertinent to consider the preliminary objection made by the 1st defendant in respect of the admissibility of paragraphs 16, 17, 24, 26, 27, '28, 30 and 32 of the 2nd plaintiffs affidavit dated 5th and 6th November 2013, which allegedly contravened the provisions of the Evidence Act of the Federal Republic of Nigeria that facts deposed to in an affidavit > " > should contain facts and not law and- that same should not be argumentative or conclusions and that the source of information in an affidavit should be stated to justify its admissibility. 37. Each paragraph complained of in the instant case had been examined to see whether it fell below the standard required in accordance with the provisions of the Evidence Act - Laws of the - . Federal Republic of Nigeria. After such examination, we found that the paragraphs were not too conclusive, argumentative or amounting to legal arguments. Similarly, some paragraphs in the counter affidavit of 13 I