“Generally, the burden of proof rests on he who alleges. Where however that person makes a prima facie case, he carries the benefit of presumption and the obligation to prove then shifts to the other party who has the burden of presenting evidence to refute that presumption”. Under the principle of proof, where the Applicants make depositions on torture, inhuman and degrading treatment, the Respondent needs to go beyond mere denial to adduce evidence to show that the Applicants were treated with respect and dignity. No single person was brought before the Court to testify in this regard neither was there any form of documentary evidence to persuade the Court to reason with the Respondent as to the falsity of the Applicants claims. In the absence of convincing evidence, the Court is again inclined to believe that the allegations of the Applicants in this regard were true. Article 5 of the African Charter promotes respect for dignity and expressly prohibits all forms of exploitation and degradation of man particularly slavery, slave trade, torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment and treatment. In the case of GABRIEL INYANG V. REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA (2018) ECW/CCJ/JUD/20/18 the Court relying on the decision in M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696 para ECHR 2011 stated thus: “Treatment is considered to be “degrading” within the meaning of Article 3 of European convention which is pari materia to the provisions of Article 5 of the ACHPR, when it humiliates or debases an individual, showing a lack of respect for, or diminishing, his or her human dignity, or when it arouses feelings of fear, anguish or inferiority capable of breaking an individual’s moral and physical resistance The court went further to state that in order for treatment to be “degrading”, the suffering or humiliation involved must in any event go beyond that inevitable element of suffering or humiliation connected with a given form of legitimate treatment.” The Court in the case of FEDERATION OF AFRICAN JOURNALISTS V. REPUBLIC OF THE GAMBIA (2018) ECW/CCJ/JUD/04/18 relied on the 23

Select target paragraph3