31. On 22 May 2009, the Respondent State forwarded its Supplementary Submissions on Merits to the Secretariat, which was transmitted to the Complainant. 32. During its 47th, 48th, 49th, and 50th Ordinary Sessions, the African Commission deferred the Communication, and the parties were AC HP R accordingly informed. The Law on Admissibility Submissions of the Complainant on Admissibility 33. With respect to Article 56(1) of the African Charter, the Complainant submits that the author of the Communication, Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum, has been revealed. It notes that the contact details of the author have also been provided. 34. According to Article 56(2) of the African Charter, for purposes of Seizure and Admissibility, the Complainant submits that it only needs to present a prima facie case. It notes that once this is done, the burden shifts to the Respondent State to submit specific responses and evidences refuting each and every one of the assertions contained in the Complainant‟s written submissions. 35. The Complainant argues that the Communication is compatible with the African Charter, noting that the Communication alleges a violation of Article 4 of the Charter and a fortiori Article 1 thereof. The Complainant indicates that the violations alleged in the Communication derive from the lack of adequate remedies, reparations or just satisfaction for wrongful 8