32. The Respondent State having failed examined admissibility conditions will observations and information other be to on take file. on part in the basis The the proceedings, of conditions the the Applicant's invoked by the Applicant and also those not invoked, will be examined. Conditions of admissibility invoked by the Applicant 33. The Applicant focusses remedies, arguing exclusively on the condition that the available administrative of exhausting the local and judicial remedies have been exhausted. 34. The Court going by the record, notes that, the Applicant filed a suit in respect of the letter of dismissal of 13 April 2010 before the Kigali High Court of Justice under number RAD 0157/10/HC/KIG. 35. On 25 January 2013, the High Court ruled that the dismissal was unlawful and ordered Rwandan EWSA to pay francs (RWF the Applicant damages in the amount of six million 6,000,000). 36. The Court notes that Sections 28 and 29 of the Organic Law No. 0312012 of 13 June 2012 on the organisation and functioning of the Supreme Court, the highest court in Rwanda, confers jurisdiction on the latter to adjudicate "appeals against the Judgments rendered in the first instance by the High Court ..." 37. The Court also notes that, in the present case, the Applicant lodged a cassation appeal against the Judgment of the High Court before the Kigali Supreme Court under appeal number RADA 0015/13/CS. The Supreme Court dismissed the said appeal by Judgment of 8 November 2013. 38. Accordingly, the Court holds that the Applicant remedies. 10 has exhausted the domestic