certain grounds.
56
These factors may include, but are not limited to grounds
such as exceptional circumstances which have resulted in miscarriage of justice;
or discovery of new and important matter or evidence which after the exercise of
due diligence, was not within the applicant‟s knowledge or could not be
produced by him or her at the time when the decision was made.
186.
Now, turning to the issue whether the application of the doctrine of functus
AC
HP
R
officio by the Court of Appeal and its refusal to re-open the trial of Kobedi, was in
the circumstance so fatal as to negate the right to fair trial in this case, the African
Commission will formulate the issue for determination under this head as
follows: does the refusal to order a retrial per se vitiate the holding of a fair trial
in violation of Article 7 of the African Charter?
187.
To arrive at its decision not to re-open the case in the light of the fresh
evidence adduced by Counsel for Kodedi, the Court of Appeal had this to say:
“On the second aspect on which the appellant seeks to lead medical evidence,
the opinion of the medical experts that the deceased‟s wounds were caused by a
high velocity bullet and not a 9mn pistol as used by the appellant is based on their
assessments of the medical records of the post-mortem findings. They did not see
the wounds. The evidence given at the trial by the pathologist called by the State
is also his opinion again based on the same records, the doctor who conducted the
post- mortem examination having died before the trial. The assessment of the trial
doctor and the Appellant‟s specialists differs and while it may be the position that
the specialists are more experienced than the trial doctor, their opinions are
untested. It cannot be said that after due cross-examination their opinions would
necessarily prevail and there is no doubt that this would affect the result of the
trial. Their opinion remains what it is: mainly their opinion. It must be weighed
against the direct evidence of the eye witnesses at the trial, which evidence was
56
See for example Article 133 of the Ghanaian Constitution, 1992
51
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents