54.In light of the above, the Court, therefore, holds that the Application meets the requirement in Rule 40(6) of the Rules and thus dismisses the Respondent State’s objection. B. Other conditions of admissibility 55.The Court notes, from the record, that the Application’s compliance with the requirements in Article 56 subarticles (1),(2),(3),(4) and 7 of the Charter, which requirements are reiterated in sub-rules 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 of Rule 40 of the Rules, is not in contention between the Parties. Nevertheless, the Court must still ascertain that these requirements have been fulfilled. 56. Specifically, the Court notes that, according to the record, the condition laid down in Rule 40(1) of the Rules is fulfilled since the Applicant has clearly indicated his identity. 57.The Court also finds that the requirement laid down in paragraph 2 of the same Rule is also met, since no request made by the Applicant is incompatible with the Constitutive Act of the African Union or with the Charter. 58.The Court also notes that the Application does not contain any disparaging or insulting language with regard to the Respondent State, which makes it consistent with the requirement of Rule 40(3) of the Rules. 59. Regarding the condition contained under paragraph 4 of same Rule, the Court notes that the Application is not based exclusively on news disseminated through the mass media. 60. Finally, with respect to the requirement laid down in Rule 40(7) of the Rules, the Court finds that the present case does not concern a case which has already been settled by the Parties in accordance with the principles of the Charter of the United 16