001093 jurisdiction to make a determination on matters of evidence already finalized by the highest tier of the Respondent State’s justice system. 31.The Applicant, for his part, submits that this Court has jurisdiction, given that, according to its Rules, the Court is empowered to evaluate the evidence on record concerning the Applicant's status and citizenship. RK 32.This Court recalls that, as it has consistently held,’ it is not an appeal court with respect to decisions rendered case-law, not preclude national this does courts in order by national courts. However, it from to determine examining whether. they as underscored relevant are in proceedings consonance standards set out in the Charter or any other applicable human in its in the with the rights instrument to which the Respondent State is a Party.? 33.The Court notes that, in the instant case, the complaints raised by the Applicant pertain to the question as to whether the domestic proceedings were in conformity with international fair trial standards guaranteed in the Charter and other international instruments ratified by the Respondent State. These are matters which, pursuant to Article 3 of the Protocol, fall within the purview of this Court's jurisdiction, regardless of the fact that they may relate to the assessment of evidence determined by the domestic courts. 1 See Application No. 001/2015. Judgment of 07/12/2018 (Merits and Reparations), Armand Guehi v. United Republic of Tanzania (Armand Guehi v. Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), § 33. See also Alex Thomas v. Tanzania (Merits), (2015) 1 AfCLR 465, §§ 60-65; and Application No. 006/2015. Judgment of 23/03/2018 (Merits), Nguza Viking and Johnson Nguza v. United Republic of Tanzania (Nguza Viking and Johnson Nguza v. Tanzania (Merits), § 35. 2 See Armand Guehi v. Tanzania (Merits and Reparations), § 33; See also Application No. 024/2015. Judgment of 07/12/2018 (Merits), Werema Wangoko Werema and Another v. United Republic of Tanzania (Werema Wangoko Werema and Another v. Tanzania (Merits), § 29; Alex Thomas v. Tanzania (Merits), § 130; Application No. 007/2013. Judgment of 03/06/2016 (Merits), Mohamed Abubakari v. United Republic of Tanzania (Mohamed Abubakari v. Tanzania (Merits), § 26; and Ernest Francis Mtingwi v. Malawi (Admissibility) (2013) 1 AFCLR 190, § 14.