10. Pleadings were closed on 12 September 2022 and the Parties were duly notified thereof. V. PRAYERS OF THE PARTIES 11. The Applicant prays the Court to review its judgment, in particular, to: i. Find that by declaring that it had no jurisdiction to deal with the alleged violations committed before the date of entry into force of the Protocol in respect of the Respondent State, the Court introduced a new fact into the case and disregarded the continuing nature of the violation of his right to be tried by an impartial court; ii. Find that he had no remedy against the decision of the Civil Service Disciplinary Board when it refused to reinstate him in his post; iii. Re-calculate the time-limits for local remedies in respect of his immovable property, starting from the date on which the domestic courts were seized until the date on which his application was examined by this Court in December 2021, and find that in the present case, local remedies were prolonged unduly; iv. Re-evaluate the amount awarded as reparation for moral damage suffered by the members of his family and by himself and set the quantum of reparation higher than or at least equal to the amounts awarded to Sébastien Germain Ajavon, his wife, and his children in Application No.013/2017: Sébastien Germain Ajavon v. Republic of Benin. 12. For its part, the Respondent State prays the Court to: v. Declare that it lacks personal jurisdiction insofar as the application for review was lodged after 30 April 2021, the date on which the withdrawal of 5