the Declaration allowing individuals to lodge applications directly against it took effect; vi. Declare the application for review inadmissible for lack of evidence of new facts; vii. Dismiss the request for a reassessment of the amount of reparation for moral damage awarded in the original judgment; viii. VI. Order the Applicant to bear the costs of the proceedings. JURISDICTION 13. When seized of an application for review, the Court does not have to ensure again that it has jurisdiction. 14. In the instant case, the jurisdiction of the Court was previously established in its judgment of 2 December 20212. However, the Respondent State raises an objection to the personal jurisdiction of the Court. 15. The Court will therefore examine this objection to its jurisdiction. 16. The Respondent State challenges the personal jurisdiction of the Court to hear the present Application. It reminds the Court that it has withdrawn its Declaration. For the Respondent State, given that its withdrawal of the Declaration came into effect on 30 April 2021, no individual or non-governmental organisation (NGO) may file an application against it before the Court as from 1 May 2021. 17. The Respondent State accordingly requests the Court to declare that it lacks personal jurisdiction to entertain the Application for review, dated 13 January 2 Kouadio Kobena Fory v. Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, ACtHPR, Application N°034/2017, Judgment of 2 December 2021, §§ 21 to 35. 6