Declaration of violation 132. The Complainant requests the Commission to find and declare that the Respondent State failed to meet its obligation, under Article 26 of the Charter, “to guarantee the independence of the courts…” Unfortunately, the Complainant does not, at any point in his submissions, develop arguments to support the alleged violation of Article 26 of the Charter. As such, the Commission cannot accede to this request. 133. On the other hand, on the basis of its analysis in this regard, the Commission concludes that the provisions of Articles 6, 7(1)(b), 7(1)(c) and 7(1)(d) of the Charter have been violated. 134. Having admitted his arguments and concluded in this respect, the Commission has to consider the prayers of the Complainant. The right to reparation for damages suffered as a result of the violation of the rights guaranteed by the Charter has been consolidated in the Commission’s jurisprudence. Reparation may take different forms depending on the rights violated and the factors of the case, ranging from administrative and judicial measures to financial compensation.42 135. Depending on the case, the Commission quantifies full reparation for lack of taking as reference the specific requests of the Complainant.43 In any event, the See Good v. Botswana op. cit. para 245; Antoine Bissangou v. Congo Communication 253/02 (2006) AHRLR 80 (ACHPR 2006); Embga Mekongo Louis v. Cameroon Communication 59/91 (2000) AHRLR 60 (ACHPR 1995) para 2. 43 See Good op. cit. 42 39