001064 b. 150. Prejudice suffered by the Applicant’s mother The Applicant also indicated that his mother as an indirect victim suffered as a result of her son's absence on account of the unlawful detention. According to the Applicant, "it was he COFFEE, which was absence. His mother who managed illegally seized suffered the and physical, family's exploited mental coffee plantation, for other BUGUMA purposes during his and moral distress for losing her illegally imprisoned son. The moral suffering of knowing that he was involved in a criminal case is a nightmare. The social stigma of having a son labelled a criminal is morally exhausting. The financial implications of his arrest were heavy. She spent a lot of money seeking justice for her son, frequenting various ministries, especially, that of Home Affairs". 151. The Applicant accordingly requests the Court to grant US $261,111 and sixty-one thousand one hundred (two hundred and eleven dollars) to his mother, Georgia Penessis, as an indirect victim. 152. For the Respondent relationship between State, him the Applicant has not provided any evidence and any indirect victim, and thus that there of a is also no evidence showing that indirect victims suffered as a result of his detention. RK 153. The Court notes that according to its established jurisprudence, members of an applicant’s family who suffered either physically or psychologically from the prejudice suffered by the victim are also considered as “victims” and may also be entitled to reparation.** 33 Norbert Zongo and Others v. Burkina Faso (Reparations) (2015) 1 ATCLR 258 § 46.