001065 vii. loss of social status; viii. limited contact with his parents. 146. The Applicant also contends that since his arrest, until 8 August 2018, the date he filed his submissions on reparations, he has been in detention for a “period of one hundred and two (102) months’. Relying on this Court’s jurisprudence in /ssa Konaté v Burkina Faso, he claims entitlement to a total amount of US$113,333 (one hundred and thirteen thousand three hundred and thirty-three dollars) in respect of moral damage. 147. The Respondent State, for its part, reiterates its contention that a link between the alleged violation and the prejudice suffered must be established and that the Applicant must bear the burden of proof in this regard. KK 148. The Court notes that the Applicant has indeed been in detention since 2010 and that this is not disputed by the Respondent State. As such, the Court recalls its earlier finding that the said detention was illegal and constitutes a breach of the Applicant's right to liberty detention and freedom not only disrupts of movement. the normal There is no doubt life of a person that such and jeopardizes a long his social status but also causes him serious physical and moral anguish. 149. Accordingly, the Court grants the Applicant's prayer for reparation Article 27(1) of the Protocol for the moral prejudice suffered during pursuant to his detention. The Court considers it appropriate to award him compensation in the amount of ten million (10,000,000) Tanzanian Shillings for the moral damage he suffered to date, and three hundred thousand (300,000) Tanzanian Shillings for every month he remains in detention after this judgment is notified to the Respondent State until the date he is released. F< fi J ) ae 37